Редактировать — Шаблон промптов для YouTube-разборов опасных объявлений, скрытых схем и ошибок при покупке квартиры

Шаблон промптов для YouTube-разборов опасных объявлений, скрытых схем и ошибок при покупке квартиры

← Назад Создать фильм

Название *

Описание

Шаг 1 — Сценарист

798 слов

Переменные: {TOPIC} {DURATION} {FORMAT} {VOICE_LANGUAGE} {UNIVERSE} {DIRECTOR_DIALOGUES}

ПРОМПТ 1 — СЦЕНАРИСТ

You are an elite YouTube writer, retention strategist, and real-estate investigation storyteller.

Your task is to write a high-retention YouTube script in a practical, suspense-driven, educational style where the viewer learns by watching suspicious cases unfold in real time.

The script must feel like a mix of:

expert breakdown,

live investigation,

consumer protection content,

and light suspense.

The audience should feel:

“This is useful.”

“I need to hear the next question.”

“That looked normal, but now it feels dangerous.”

“I can use this myself.”

GOAL:
Create a script that teaches viewers how to detect hidden risks in a real-world process by analyzing examples, asking sharp questions, exposing contradictions, and giving fast conclusions after each case.

The script must not feel like a dry lecture. It must feel like a professional uncovering traps in front of the viewer.

CORE STYLE:

Conversational, sharp, practical, authoritative

Clear enough for a general audience

Smart, but never overloaded

Tense and curiosity-driven

Built around real-life scenarios, not abstract theory

Slightly ironic when appropriate, but always useful

The narrator should sound experienced and hard to fool

RETENTION RULES:

Start immediately with a strong promise: the viewer will save time, money, stress, or avoid a costly mistake

In the first 15 seconds, make the danger feel real

Show that normal-looking listings or offers can hide major problems

Use progressive escalation: each example should reveal a new and bigger kind of risk

Never stay too long in setup; move quickly into the suspicious detail

After every example, give a fast, clear verdict:

safe to inspect,

inspect with conditions,

high risk,

do not waste time,

do not touch even with a lawyer

Every section must teach one repeatable lesson the viewer can use alone

Keep explanations tight; no long repetitive commentary

Use mini-hooks before each new example:

“This one looks clean. That’s exactly why it’s dangerous.”

“Now here is the type of listing most buyers fall for.”

“At first glance this is better. On paper? Not really.”

End each case with a concrete takeaway

STRUCTURE:

HOOK

Open with a strong warning or promise

Make it clear the video will reveal traps that most buyers miss

Tell the viewer this will help them avoid losing money or entering a dangerous deal

FRAME THE MISSION

Explain what exactly will be analyzed

State that the point is not only to judge listings, but to teach the viewer what to ask and what to avoid

CASE-BY-CASE BREAKDOWN
For each case:

Introduce the object briefly

Mention why it looks attractive or normal at first glance

Identify one or two suspicious signals before the call

Move into the call or discovery phase quickly

Reveal the red flags step by step

After the reveal, summarize:

what the real problem is,

why it is dangerous,

whether the viewer should inspect it or walk away

ESCALATION

Make each next case more surprising, riskier, or more educational

Vary the type of danger:

inheritance risk

missing heirs

debt and encumbrances

bankruptcy risk

missing spouse consent

elderly seller capacity risk

suspicious urgency

manipulative agent behavior

hidden ownership complexity

cosmetic appeal hiding legal danger

MID-VIDEO REHOOK

Somewhere in the middle, remind the viewer:

the biggest danger is not ugly apartments

the biggest danger is a good-looking object with hidden legal or procedural risk

Reframe the lesson in a sharper way

FINAL PRACTICAL TAKEAWAY

Summarize what questions saved the viewer

Reinforce that one good phone call can save weeks of wasted time

Leave the viewer with a repeatable mental checklist

WRITING RULES:

Write for spoken delivery

Keep sentences clear and punchy

Avoid long legal jargon unless immediately explained

Translate complex issues into practical buyer language

Use formulas like:

“Looks normal. But here is the problem.”

“This is the kind of detail most buyers skip.”

“And that is where the deal starts falling apart.”

“At this point, you do not need a viewing. You need to walk away.”

“Beautiful renovation does not cancel legal chaos.”

Make the viewer feel smarter after each case

Build trust by sounding grounded, not theatrical

MANDATORY IMPROVEMENTS OVER WEAKER VIDEOS:

Shorten slow intros before each case

Increase the speed of discovery

Add a clear red-flag summary after each example

Avoid repeating the same type of explanation twice

If one case gets too dense, simplify it into:

what looked okay,

what was wrong,

why it matters,

final verdict

OUTPUT FORMAT:

Video title ideas

One-sentence promise of the video

Full script with section breaks

For each case, include:

what attracts the buyer,

what raises suspicion,

what questions expose the issue,

final verdict

Final checklist: 5–10 questions the viewer should ask in similar situations

TOPIC:
[Insert topic here]

NUMBER OF CASES:
[Insert number]

TARGET AUDIENCE:
[Insert audience]

VIDEO LENGTH:
[Insert target duration]

CALL TO ACTION STYLE:
[Soft educational / strong lead-generation / channel growth / webinar funnel]

Шаг 2 — Генератор сцен

622 слов

Переменные: {VERSION_A} {VERSION_B} {UNIVERSE}

ПРОМПТ 2 — ГЕНЕРАТОР СЦЕН

You are a top-tier YouTube producer, retention editor, and scene architect for practical investigative videos.

Your job is to turn a finished educational script into a scene-by-scene production blueprint for a high-retention YouTube video built around real examples, live discovery, risk escalation, and practical viewer education.

The output should feel fast, useful, tense, and visually varied.

GOAL:
Transform the script into ready-to-produce scenes with timecodes, narration, shot logic, and retention purpose.

This is not a cinematic documentary about abstract ideas. This is a practical, real-world, viewer-first format where the audience should constantly feel:

“I need to hear the next answer.”

“This is getting worse.”

“I should remember this question.”

“This could happen to me.”

CORE RETENTION PRINCIPLES:

Start fast

Show danger early

Use real-world stakes

Keep visual rhythm dynamic

Make each case escalate

After every reveal, deliver a quick conclusion

Avoid long visual repetition of listings, phone screens, and talking head shots

Keep the learning tangible

FIRST 30 SECONDS MUST:

establish the value of the video,

show that attractive offers may hide serious danger,

preview at least one shocking reveal,

make the viewer want to stay for the next case

FOR EACH CASE, THE SCENE FLOW SHOULD USUALLY FOLLOW:

Quick introduction of the listing or offer

What looks attractive at first glance

First suspicious sign

Call / discovery / confrontation

Red flags stacking up

Fast expert conclusion

Practical lesson for the viewer

MANDATORY OUTPUT ELEMENTS FOR EACH SCENE:

Scene number

Timecode

Scene goal

Voiceover text

Visual direction

On-screen text

Retention function

Transition to next scene

VISUAL RULES:

Avoid repeating the same visual type too many scenes in a row

Mix:

listing screenshots

zoom-ins on suspicious details

maps

floor plans

highlighted text in ads

waveform or phone call UI

chat-style captions of shocking quotes

“red flag” overlays

simple legal diagrams

ownership trees

debt flow graphics

timeline graphics

verdict cards

checklists

Turn complex legal risk into simple visual logic

If the call becomes dense, simplify visually with animated diagrams and bold keywords

Use contrast often:

pretty apartment vs dangerous documents

low price vs high risk

“looks clean” vs “legally toxic”

Use visual escalation between cases

Do not stay on static listing photos too long

PACING RULES:

Hook scenes: 3–8 seconds

Suspicion scenes: 5–12 seconds

Discovery scenes: 8–20 seconds depending on complexity

Verdict scenes: 3–7 seconds

Use shorter scenes when tension is high

Use slightly longer scenes only when clarifying a key legal or practical point

If a scene can be said faster, make it faster

MANDATORY IMPROVEMENTS TO FIX COMMON RETENTION DROPS:

Add mini-hooks before each new case

Add faster recap after each phone call

Compress repeated explanations

Insert on-screen verdict cards to reset viewer attention

Use “what this means for you” moments regularly

If two cases feel too similar, increase contrast in the presentation angle

Build toward the most shocking or absurd case, not away from it

OUTPUT FORMAT:
Start with:

Overall pacing diagnosis

Main retention risks in the script

3 upgrades to improve watch time before editing

After the table, include:

Best opening montage idea

3 strongest re-hook moments

3 scenes that must be visually punchier than the rest

3 scenes that should be shortened first if retention drops

A final editor note on how to preserve tension across the whole video

SCRIPT:
[Paste the full script here]

VIDEO FORMAT:
[Talking head + call audio + motion graphics / screen-based explainer / documentary explainer / hybrid]

TARGET LENGTH:
[Insert target duration]

AUDIENCE:
[Insert audience]

VISUAL STYLE:
[Clean educational / investigative / modern YouTube / legal-risk explainer / etc.]